Animal Rights Essay: Do Animals Have Rights?
There has been numerous cases in the recent years that have caught the public eye, yet nothing seems to change. From well known celebrities to repeat offenders, the animal rights violations continue. One might wonder how one can be so cruel to animals when these creatures share so many similarities to the human race. Many efforts have been made.
Do animals have rights essay presented below is an attempt to make it clear whether animals should be protected against violence and cruelty of people. The following animal rights essay provides arguments in favor and against the issue of animal rights protection.
Should animals have rights? According to the website Merriam-Webster, animals rights means animals should have their right to be protected from exploitation and abuse by humans, especially the rights not to be exploited for human purposes. Animals should have their rights because they are a portion of the earth as well as human beings.
Animal rights also include the right to an animal’s own fundamental rights, such as being able to have control over their own lives. Legal Classification In many countries around the world, animals are considered to be sentient beings that have no rights of their own and are continuously objectified.
Animal rights is not just a philosophy—it is a social movement that challenges society’s traditional view that all nonhuman animals exist solely for human use. As PETA founder Ingrid Newkirk has said, “When it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.
This essay on Do Non-Human Animals Have Rights? was written and submitted by your fellow student. More This paper has been submitted by user Harrison I. who studied at Ohio University, USA, with average GPA 3.6 out of 4.0.
It is therefore undisputed that these animals have rights just like human beings do. They have the right to existence and survival, good life, good health and nutrition and a good home too. These rights should not be sacrificed merely because humans believe that the advantageous penalties for humans of such sacrifice are extra imperative than that of the shortcoming for animals.